 |
|
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
 | |
|
 | ||||||||
|
 |
 |
|
 Rainbow Icon |
|
Add Rainbow icon to cartIcon sizes: 256x256, 64x64, 48x48, 32x32, 24x24, 16x16, 512x512
File formats: ICO, GIF, PNG, BMP
Purchase entire Large Weather Icons now! View Large Weather Icons now!
Download demo icons
Tags: icon package, web 2.0 email icons, attachment icon in outlook, how to make pictures into icons, rainbow online now icons
We discussed paradox with suppression of the initiative of the adviser and advised to it to adhere to norm. The biggest sector of the given trade is made by advisers for computers. They work in an industry, updated each 6 months! Really in the computer world there are no norms. How the adviser for programming adhere to norm when it ask to make absolutely new program for the conveyor supervised by robots, for example, should? If its program at first does not work or in it too many malfunctions, him can accuse of a withdrawal from normal practice, for what it is necessary to be responsible.All aforesaid we at all do not wish to frighten off you from consulting. However you should think of that chaotic world in which live strong. On one of labels on a bumper it has been written: «If you are not angered on a maximum, means do not pay attention».
CASE FROM PRACTICE
J. ? – the beginning adviser. Before it within 12 years worked in agency of the federal government as the employee who is engaged in the conclusion of contracts on delivery. Has then decided to start to work independently, «having come over to other party» and advising the clients, trying to receive the governmental contracts. Eventually, who can know better a way of drawing up of the advantageous offer, how not former employee on the conclusion of contracts?
Knowing that its former agency prepared the agreement on the conclusion of the contract on delivery of a certain necessary product with the final income in some millions dollars, and also understanding that only two manufacturers could, how much it is possible, to satisfy the given requirement, he has paid visit to the manufacturer And and has offered the services. Upon Mr. X has made impression experience of J. N.On has asked about the fee and about quantity of time for offer drawing up. J. ? has responded that can write that for three weeks and that the fee will make $35.000. And Mr. X has agreed, has passed a folder with documents and has told:« Here our specification and the prices. Go to work right now, and our legal department will send you the contract ». J. ? was delighted with the first task and felt that is on a way to successful independent career. It has gone at once to work. He worked days, nights, on days off and has finished the offer on the contract conclusion for two weeks (a week earlier). Having returned to office of Mr. X, he has learnt that one week ago that has been dismissed and that now its place Mr. U. has occupied last has told that knows nothing about the agreement of Mr. X from J. ? that it cannot find the written contract and does not approve the invitation of people from outside for drawing up of offers on the contract conclusion when in the company three persons making the offers for the governmental contracts constantly work. As a result of J. ? has been dismissed.
Copyright © 2009-2022 Aha-Soft. All rights reserved.
|
More info
